Showing posts with label Steve Gerber. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Gerber. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Panel Discussion: Spotlight on Steve Gerber!

 


Redartz:  Usually when we open these 'panel discussions', we are talking about art and artists. Today we're going to look instead at one of the Bronze Age's most unique writers: Steve Gerber. Most readers know him from his extensive work for Marvel, but he also did work for DC and some Indies as well. He even had a second career life in tv animation, including the creation of "Thundarr, the Barbarian". 

 Gerber's writing style was often esoteric, quirky, and deeply personal. This was one of the things which attracted me to his work; beginning with his classic writing on Marvel's "Man-Thing". About the same time (this was actually the time at which I first started collecting comics and was eagerly sampling anything in four color print) I discovered his "Defenders" and "Daredevil", and he became one of my top favorite writers. 

When Gerber wrote a comic, it was jam-packed. It was sure to be a good half hour read, at any rate. Frequently he included text pages in his stories, which probably was a break for the artists. 

And the characters he revived or created: Howard the Duck, the Foolkiller, the Headmen, Omega the Unknown, Starhawk, and a certain infamous Elf With a Gun. The same young teen who loved
Dr. Demento on the radio was enthralled by such oddities. I mentioned above Gerber's penchant for introspection; it was this tendency that made "Omega" so appealing to me. And the same was true for another of Gerber's psychological studies, "The Kid's Night  Out" in Giant Size Man-Thing 4. Gerber seemed at the time to be writing specifically to me (yes, I was a hopeless nerd, but a harmless one). 

 

 

 

 

And aside from weirdness and navel-contemplation, Gerber could write some darned fine stories. His "Night of the Living Dead" was excellent. His "Phantom Zone" miniseries for DC was quite interesting. And we haven't even touched on "Howard the Duck" or "Guardians of the Galaxy".

 

 

 

 

 

So here's a few more images from 'Gerber's Greatest Hits'.  While you pore over them, you can consider your own thoughts about the man and his work. Were you a fan? Gerber's work didn't appeal to everyone, granted. If you were, what were your favorites? What titles would  you have liked to see him tackle? Which artists seemed to mesh best with his unique vision? Comment away...

 













 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Saturday, September 22, 2018

Rank and File: The Year's Best Comic Stories, 1975!




Redartz:  1975; what a year! Marvel was still putting out the "Giant-Size" issues, as well as Marvel Value Stamps. Atlas Comics were trying to make a go of the comic business. DC was debuting numerous new titles and characters. It was an exciting time to be a comic reader, which leads us to our topic today: the best stories of that fine year. 

I've pored over loads of issues, and prodded my memory to recall my favorites. So, as always, this subjective list; based upon a combination of personal preference and historical impact. Your list my vary. Order is random. No deposit, no return. Void where prohibited. 

Ok, now that the formalities are complete, on with the countdown:



 



1. Defenders 33- "Webbed Hands, Warm Heart" by Steve Gerber, Sal Buscema and Jim Mooney. Inspired lunacy from Mr. Gerber with 'musical brains', the Headmen and a very angry baby deer.










 

2. Detective Comics 457- "There is no Hope in Crime Alley" by Dennis O'Neal and Dick Giordano. A nice closer look at the Batman's origins by a couple of his best storytellers. Oh, and uncredited backgrounds by the great Terry Austin.











 
3. Warlock 11- "How Strange My Destiny, Pt. 2" by Jim Starlin and Steve Leialoha. Starlin's epic tale continues the exploration of Adam Warlock. Great cast, great art, great story, great comic.













 
4. Tomb of Dracula 41- "Re-Birth" by Marv Wolfman, Gene Colan and Tom Palmer. Dracula returns, in another fine issue of this fine series. Wolfman, Colan and Palmer just keep it rolling.














 
5. All-Star Comics 58- "All-Star Super Squad" by Gerry Conway, Ric Estrada and Wally Wood. Power Girl debuts in this engaging revival of the classic DC title.












 

6.  Howard the Duck 1- "Howard the Barbarian" by Steve Gerber, Frank Brunner and Steve Leialoha. A very imaginative,enjoyable first issue, Brunner and Leialoha rock visually. A fun guest appearance by Spidey, and a tower of credit cards. 











 
7.  Amazing Adventures 34, "A Death in the Family" by Don McGregor and P. Craig Russell. A dramatic high point in this excellent series. Phenomenal art, as usual. 













 
8.  Avengers 142- "Go West, Young Gods" by Steve Englehart, George Perez and Vince Colletta.The Avengers in the old West. Absolutely wonderful. Another Kang war, Immortus, the Brand Corp., Thor and Moondragon on a train, and Hawkeye having way too much fun. How did they pack so much into one issue?













 
9. Giant-Size X-Men 1- "Second Genesis" by Len Wein and Dave Cockrum.There are better stories of the 'new team', but this classic giant introduces us to the group that became a pillar of the Marvel Universe. Wein and Cockrum get things started with a bang.















10. Giant-Size Man-Thing 4- "The Kid's Night  Out" by Steve Gerber, Ed Hannigan and Frank Springer; "Frog Death" by Steve Gerber and Frank Brunner. A  personal favorite, with a rather emotion-laden lead story. A bit preachy perhaps,but quite impactful to a shy fourteen year old comic fan. And it's offset by the return of Howard the Duck in a Brunner-illustrated short. Loads of fun, the scene in the cigar store is a blast.



Incidentally, if Will Eisner's Spirit stories in the Warren magazine had been 'new', they would certainly have made the list. Those "Spirit"s were high on my buying list all that year. And this year, it seems, was a very solid one for Marvel (and for one Steve Gerber). But, that's just my take. What think you?

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Panel Discussion: Defending the Defenders!

Martinex1: The dynamic Defenders - they always presented themselves as the "Non-Team," a loose band of costumed adventurers, a magician, Norse warrior, Atlantean prince and gamma irradiated creature.  But they were more than a non-team; they were family. They weren’t genetically (or cosmically) tied together like the Fantastic Four, but these angry oddballs cared about one another and lived in unison with one another.   And in doing so they became a major part of Marvel's Bronze Age.

Making their way into the Marvel scene in late 1971 in Marvel Feature and following up in 1972 with their eponymous comic, the Defenders had my interest from the first time I saw them on the spinner rack.  I constantly searched for back issues that tended to be at very reasonable prices.  The individual characters may not have been my main collecting targets, but together they were something else entirely.




Despite the mystique of a team without ties, the Defenders bound together fairly well and I contend the core of the team weathered roster changes better and less frequently than the Avengers. And from the overall perspective of heroes in the Marvel world, they must have been a powerhouse team.  Hulk, Namor, Valkyrie, Dr. Strange, Nighthawk and Hellcat were no slouches.   Individually, the top three characters could mop up the floor with the majority of the Marvel villains.  Let’s face it, the Hulk, Sub-Mariner and Doc could hold their own against the Avengers’ big three Captain America, Iron Man, and Thor.
  
But the book itself seemingly absorbed the feel of the team it represented.  Were they second tier, mismatched semi-stars?  Was the monthly good but not great?  It was never a top seller.  Despite interesting stories and even top notch art, it became a bit of a "non-book" and although it has had a few short resurgences it hasn’t been resurrected successfully like countless other properties.  The comic itself came to represent to me the outsiders, the misfits, and the heroic underdogs.


Even the recent Netflix television show starred entirely different heroes (although it can be argued that at least Luke Cage and Daredevil guest-starred in some Defenders’ arcs).  What is it about this team?  They are so fascinating but also so often relegated to being “also-rans.” 
 Did the caliber of their villainous enemies lower their status?  They didn’t regularly battle the likes of Dr. Doom, Galactus, Kang, or Ultron.   The Defenders were more likely to lock horns with Scorpio, the Wrecking Crew, the Presence, and the Headmen.   Or Yandroth, the Six-Fingered Hand and the Mandrill.   And amidst those offbeat tales, the writers added guest characters like Dollar Bill and the Elf with a Gun.   Even when Dormammu and Loki showed up, it seemed like an odd pairing - enjoyable and entertaining but odd nonetheless.






But that is what gave The Defenders its unique feel and what pulled me in.   These weren’t Earth’s Mightiest Heroes (though I guess that is debatable); they were the World’s Wary Warriors.   How would you describe them?   I pick up on their slight cynicism, their outsider status, and their weirdo tendencies.  How many issues can go by without an angry outburst, somebody quitting the team, a character getting pulled back in out of obligation, friendship, camaraderie, and familial humor?    Where else would Hellcat (a romantic teen character turned heroic acrobat) or Nighthawk (billionaire villain turned heart-and-soul sponsor) fit in? 


Along the way Steve Englehart, Len Wein, Ed Hannigan, David Anthony Kraft, J.M. DeMatteis, and of course Steve Gerber and others led the way with the outlandish stories and quirky situations.   Although the book had a variety of artists, Sal Buscema may be most closely associated with the team as he shepherded the Defenders through the early years.  Don Perlin also handled a long run on the series. 

My favorite tales involved the Badoon, the Squadron Supreme, and the Headmen.   Those all seemed like fitting adversaries for the Defenders.  The arc in which the Guardians of the Galaxy shared the stage and female and male Badoon confronted each other is a classic in my eyes; it is amongst my most cherished and collected arcs.   The Headmen arc is just so strange and hilarious that it too is a classic.



When our peers talk about the Defenders, it seems like most really appreciate the series.   But the team is rarely mentioned in the same breath as the Avengers, X-Men, JLA,  Teen Titans or Fantastic Four.   Why is that?  

The series is full of drama and tragedy and pathos; it explores many philosophical themes but it rarely is considered as emotionally complex as the X-Men in their heyday? Why is that?

When comic collectors talk about female characters, Valkyrie seems to rise to the top in terms of admiration but she still never gets the spotlight like She-Hulk, Storm, Rogue, or others.  Why is that?  

When character design is mentioned, Nighthawk gets accolades for his "new" costume; and despite decades of character development he never reached recognizable status like other Marvel icons.   Why is that?

They may have had loose origins as the Titans Three guest starring in the Sub-Mariner, but ended up with some other interesting characters all their own.  Do you like the headlining characters like Dr. Strange and the Hulk or do you prefer Hellcat, Nighthawk, Red Guardian, Gargoyle, and the rest?  Why is that?


Personally I was less interested in the revamped team toward the end of the run.  I saw it as an outlet to capitalize on unused X-Men characters, and despite liking the Beast, Angel, and Moondragon, the new bunch did not have the same charisma in my eyes.  But in the 1990s when it was hinted at in Namor and The Incredible Hulk books that there was going to be a reunion of the originals, I was all on board.  Just the thought of the band getting back together had me eager even with the recent character developments for those core heroes.


I have to admit that I abhorred The Secret Defenders; it had a 1990's era vibe of weak stories with a constantly changing cast including the latest hot character.  On the other hand, I much appreciated the short-lived Kurt Busiek and Erik Larson version of the team.  Although it did not seem as weighty as the original, it had a vibrant sense of humor that I enjoyed.  It was true to its roots while being modern.



What is it about the Defenders that keeps them down?  Or am I looking at it from the wrong perspective?   I definitely have a nostalgic feel for this team but what do you think?   Defend the Defenders today! What were your favorite arcs?  Who were your favorite writers and artists?   Did you think the book pushed boundaries too far?   Is it a classic title or not?   What went right and what went wrong? 

We’d like to hear from you today so please comment if you have anything to say in support of the defense.

You Might Also Like --

Here are some related posts: